May 25, 2011
Canucks, Cups and Cliches

The lexicon of sport is riddled with mantras that are so oft repeated, they sometimes sound hollow. And as the battles intensify, the calls of our “best players need to be our best players”, “we’ve got to leave it all out there”, and “you gotta be good to be lucky” can be heard everywhere.

And last night, the Canucks proved that every damn one of them is true.

On a night where they entered play with three chances to punch their ticket to a Stanley Cup Final, the Canucks could have been guilty of “counting their chickens before they hatch” as they had in their last two series’ game five encounters.

Indeed, Don Cherry, who rarely has more than a back-handed compliment for the Canucks (more on that in a future post), commented that the Canucks were “ripe for the picking” after the first period of last night’s game, despite holding a 1-0 lead.

But on this night, the Canucks’ best player was one Roberto Luongo, who began the series, despite a game one victory, in the doghouse of many once more for giftwrapping a Joe Thornton series’ opening marker.

And when your $10 million keeper (as he is typically, and inflammatorily, referred to in this market) is your best player, it might not matter how well the finally present-and-accounted-for Sharks play.

And the Canucks’ second best players on this night were the Sedins, who displayed their most dominant five on five performance of this playoff. And while that wasn’t enough on its own to guarantee victory, it was plenty to take some pressure off labouring leader Ryan Kesler.

Kesler, of course, “left nothing out there” despite seemingly suffering an early lower body injury - one that would have kept him (or perhaps Joe Thornton) off the ice in most instances. And, of course, it was Kesler who found his way to the front of the net in typical fashion to deflect in the late game-tying goal.

Which brings us to “Lady Luck”. Shark fans are lamenting another seemingly premature exit, this time wallowing in their collective misfortune as opposed to a final game no show by the usual suspects. After all, the face-off that set up the tying goal shouldn’t have happened. There should have been no icing since Dan Boyle’s clearing attempt hit Daniel Sedin on the way out.

But suffice is to say, blown icing calls don’t result in goals all by themselves. Joe Thornton lost a draw (or rather Henrik Sedin won it). The Canucks managed a quick point shot and Kesler, undefended in his offce, tipped home the tying goal. So the Canucks were indeed good to be lucky. Or at least, the Sharks weren’t good enough to avoid this misfortune.

Of course, the overtime winner was about the most bizarre goal you will ever see, with literally none of the 19,000 fans in the building nor the millions viewing at home having any idea how it found its way into the net. Yes, it seemed only Kevin Bieksa and possibly Patrick Marleau had any idea what was happening. So you can imagine how that little one-on-one battle might end.

In the case of Bieksa, who is playing at a level right now that is uncharted by any Canuck defenseman before him, we shall henceforth refer to him as “The Amazing Bieksa”. Yes, his powers now seem to extend to almost the supernatural - able to suspend the attention of both teams, and millions of viewers long enough to barely dribble a pathetic point shot past an unsuspecting goalie, whose run of good fortune has seemingly ended.

So yes, the Canucks were lucky last night.  But the luck only means something because they were good enough to have rightfully earned a three games to one series lead to begin with.

And now you will likely hear lots of commentary about how this team is a “team of destiny”.  After all, Bieksa’s double overtime winner came 17 years to the day that Greg Adams’ memorable gave 5 double OT winner had identically vaulted the Canucks to the final. And while it might work out that way, it is only because this team is good enough to determine its own destiny.

May 16, 2011
Canucks Get What They Deserve

In a game where the Canucks outshot, outchanced and outhit their opposition, the final 3-2 result was a just one.

And while Sharks’ fans will be bitterly complaining about a phantom Dany Heatley elbowing penalty that gave the Canucks the chance for the game-winning tally, the biggest factor in the Sharks having the lead for most of the night was another gift, this one not provided by the officials, but Roberto Luongo. 

For perhaps the first time all play-offs, the Canucks displayed the type of game that made them the best regular season team.

Often rolling four lines and having their defense engaged in the attack (even when protecting a late game lead), the Canucks combined a resilient performance from Roberto Luongo (after said first period gaffe) with a most opportunistic power play to give the weary Sharks just what they should have expected.

Game One showed the Canucks with little rust after a lengthy layoff and established clearly (like there was any doubt) that this will not be another round of paint drying, instead providing the faithful plenty of edge of your seat excitement. 

Perhaps the biggest story in the game was the dominant performance from the Sedins, whom coach Alain Vigneault rode harder as the game progressed, putting aside any notions, for today anyway, that certain brother(s) may be playing hurt.

When Luongo’s first period tape-to-tape pass wound up on Joe Thornton’s stick and in the net, you could feel the life being sucked out of the building.  But Lou was able to park that brain fart, as were his mates. 

What pleased us most about this game was how the Canucks played after finally getting the lead mid-way through the third period.  Against Chicago and Nashville, they were often guilty of attempting to baby their leads, collapsing into rope-a-dope fashion, with an often predictable result.  Not this time.  Whether consciously attempting to bury the more tired Sharks or now being more relaxed and confident in their approach, the result was what we’d all become accustomed to throughout the season.

This is the edge that the Canucks must maintain througout to eke out the final seven wins to complete the job.  And while we expect the Sharks to put up more resistance next game, these repeated third period collapses (three in the last four games) can’t be good for their collective psyche.

June 1, 2010
Figures and Facts

As we are prone to doing, while ingesting another hearty breakfast this morning and perusing the stats pages of the morning paper, we stumbled upon these brilliant observations:

FIGURE - Joe Thornton wound up a minus 11 for the playoffs, by far the worst on his team.  Combine this with his performance at the Olympics where he was one of only 2 Canadian players to wind up on the negative side of the ledger.

FACT - Surfer Joe will never be a leader on a successful playoff team.  And for $7 million per season, who wants a guy that’s just along for the ride?

FIGURE - The Montreal Canadiens despite advancing to the Conference Final remarkably had only two full time players with a positive plus minus in this playoff run and, as a team, scored 11 less goals than their opposition.

FACT - Once Jaroslav Halak fell back to earth, the Habs were exposed for the mediocre team they really are.  All you Hab fans out there thinking this playoff run is a sign of good things to come, think again.  Next year at this time, you’ll again be lamenting Bob Gainey’s over-priced signings of all those midget forwards.

FIGURE - Hockey Night in Canada last night revealed some crazy stat for Antti Niemi; in his last 12 third periods his save percentage is well over 96%. 

FACT - This Finn has proven to be completely unflappable and when Chicago goes on to win the Cup, given the struggles of the first line in the Finals, he might just be hugging the Conn Smythe Trophy, making him the third straight Euro to do so.  We can’t wait for Don Cherry’s rationalization of that.