October 12, 2011
What a Difference a Game (or Two) Makes?

By the end of last season’s brush with the Stanley Cup, both Keith Ballard and Cody Hodgson were so poorly thought of by those filling out the roster card that despite a sudden rash of injuries, neither were deemed worthy of even drawing into the line-up.

But if you take seriously what some of the most esteemed hockey writers in town have to say, then all is now suddenly good with these two once forgotten men.  Never mind about Canucks’ fans being finicky and panicky, it’s really the media in this town who will find a story even when there isn’t one.

According to Iain MacIntyre (easily the best of the local writers in our estimation), or perhaps simply his editor, Ballard has gone from “bleak to peak performer”.  We will admit that Ballard has looked uncharacteristically comfortable after two games.  And has a highlight reel goal to match - though most credit is due to Henrik Sedin (only the game’s best playmaker) on that one.  But is anyone really prepared to pass judgement yet?

And the oft maligned Cody Hodgson is the focus of the headline story in today’s Vancouver Province.  With Jason Botchford (as a subtle aside - has anyone checked out his morning spot on the Team 1040 - knowledgeable and witty, but perhaps a voice made for writing?) singing the praises of young Cody, who also has one nifty goal to his credit after two games.  And again, Hodgson does look “sharp” thus far, but as Botchford will likely admit this may have more to do with the relative poor play of his lead footed wingers, who would make the average duffers hockey player look fleet afoot right now.

For the record, if it wasn’t already clear, we’ve been big backers of feeding Hodgson as much quality ice as he can handle.  We just don’t know why it’s taken so long.  That’s really the bigger story.  What with last year’s Stanley Cup champs getting strong performances from the likes of youngsters Tyler Seguin and Brad Marchand, while the Canucks were too afraid to ice Hodgson over the likes of Swiss League pro Jeff Tambellini.

In the end, after two games, Ballard is playing comfortably on the third pairing (having played significantly less minutes than everyone but Chris Tanev), which is only noteworthy in contrast to his $4 million plus salary.  When the inevitable injuries come and Ballard must play top line minutes, we shall see if he is really “peaking”.

And, of course, the real story as it relates to Hodgson will unfold only when Ryan Kesler returns to the line-up.  Based on his very limited play thus far, he’s earned a spot to continue playing, but that will be at the expense of his aforementioned veteran linemates (Marco Sturm and Mikael Samuelsson).  No matter how he performs in the limited sample size until Kesler’s return, the Canucks owe it to themselves to continue to give their prized prospect every chance to succeed.

October 8, 2010
Opening Night Notes

With just over 24 hours until the much anticipated launch of the Canucks’ 40 anniversary season, the hype is unprecedented.  And that’s saying something.  Oddly, things have been rather quiet here at CC.  You can blame that on some variation of the common cold.  Call us soft, but it’s only pre-season.  Anyway, here are some random comments on the activities in Canuckville over the last week:

  • Yesterday’s Vancouver Sun featured a pullout section devoted entirely to the Canucks entitled “Great Expectations”.  You’ll note that was the same title as a lengthy post here back on September 10.  They say ”imitation is the sincerest form of flattery”; we’d be happy with some money.
  • You had to love SOB’s parting shots at Coach Vigneault.  And AV’s typical high road response.  Believe whom you will, one thing is clear, find yourself in Coach V’s doghouse and a trip to hockey purgatory is not far behind.  Just ask Mathieu Schneider (Phoenix) or Kyle Wellwood (the KHL) or now, Shane O’Brien (Nashville) and Darcy Hordichuk (Florida).  You can expect our next poll question to be: who will be next to find accommodation in Chateau Bow-Wow?
  • Both of the local papers ran listings of the coaches facing the most pressure this season in the NHL.  Surprisingly, the aforementioned Vigneault was not included.  With the pressure in this town this season, anything short of a Conference Final berth will be cause for heads to roll.  And if this team struggles early and often with discipline and preparation, there will be panic and scapegoating…
  • Credit is due to Canuck capologist Laurence Gilman for his fancy math that allowed the team to be under the cap limit.  Though it’s hard to see how shipping some guys back and forth to Manitoba can be seen as “in the spirit of the collective bargaining agreement”.
  • From the 2 pre-season games we saw, Peter Schaefer impressed more than Brendan Morrison so it seemed appropriate that he found himself a roster spot.  He’s creative with the puck and still has a great shot.  He’s known to be a little flaky though.  A candidate for the next team whipping boy?
  • Enough already with the melodrama about who will be captain.  They know.  We know.  Get on with it. 
  • Monday was another civically proclaimed “Canuck day” by Vancouver dictator mayor Gregor Robertson.  Not even 6 months after the last “Canuck day”, this one was in celebration of the Canucks’ 40 anniversary.  Fortunately, despite Gregor’s best efforts to distract us all from the bike lane fiasco, the local media was wise enough to not chase this bone.
  • As long time season ticket holders and amateur Canuck historians, we look forward to tomorrow night’s 40th anniversary hoopla.  Of course, we’ll report back on same to our valued reader(s).

Enjoy your long weekend and our status, for the time being anyway, as bona-fide Stanley Cup favourites…