June 2, 2011
Another Stanley Cup Game One Gem for Canucks…

Okay, so there’s only been three.  But they’ve all been memorable and entertaining games decided on literally the game’s final play.

Last night’s tilt ended in somewhat similar fashion to the Canucks’ last game one Stanley Cup Final appearance, when another Greg Adams overtime winner earned the Canucks (and mostly Kirk McLean with 52 saves) another clutch performance.  This time it was Raffi Torres converting on a quick strike pass (this one from Jannik Hansen and not Cliff Ronning) and another brilliant Roberto Luongo effort (a 36 save shutout performance).

And there was the 1982 version, who trailed the champion Islanders 4-2, but then surged to a 5-4 third period lead before Harold Snepsts completed the worst night of life.  Let’s just leave it at that.  Though it’s worth noting that an autographed Snepsts jersey fetched more at last night’s silent auction than the price of admission.  Yes, we still love our losers.

And before the naysayers start complaining that this series is shaping up as another Nashville snoozefest, they clearly were looking only at the scoresheet.

There were plenty of interesting story lines - the Dan Hamhuis hit (and injury), an Alex Burrows biting allegation, another typically remarkable performance from Tim Thomas and an arguably better performance by the maligned Luongo who still may be three wins away from being considered a true clutch goalie in the minds of most.

But besides these obvious plot lines, what about the Bruins’ decision to put Zdeno Chara up front on a power play that has been and continues to be absolutely brutal.  Sooner or later, this inability to score with the extra man will cost them their playoff lives.  With Chara in front of the net, his lethal slap shot is completely negated and a good portion of his monstrous frame is above the goalie’s perspective anyway.  Clearly, when it comes to screening the goalie, bulk is more important than height.  And it’s not like he’s going to be able to bury too many loose pucks with that ten foot barge pole.  But we’re giving away too many secrets here…

And what about the Canucks’ third line, whose performance against the grinding Bruins just might be the pivotal performance of this series.  Can we please put to bed the notion of a Manny Malhotra return for now?  Don’t get us wrong, Manny is a useful player.  But can he really be expected to be an impact player?  Especially now after over two months of inactivity and with his replacement fitting in perfectly on a third line that has been very difficult to play against, let alone providing some of the signature goals of this now remarkable run.

In the end, despite the power play ineptness of both teams last night, we shouldn’t have been surprised with what we got. 

The Canucks came out buzzing with the Bruins’ only reprieve provided by a run of penalties. 

By the mid-point of the third period, it looked like the Canucks were running on low and the Bruins were in good shape to capitalize.

But the typically fit Canucks found another gear only to find that Tim Thomas will stop pretty much everything he can see, no matter how perfect the set-up.  Indeed, the Canucks will have to get some greasy ones to take this series.

And before we get too far into our parade planning, we might want to consider that while we’ve won every game one of this playoff run, the Bruins have lost all but one.

With Dan Hamhuis out, and possibly Alex Burrows, the battle has just begun.  Enjoy the ride. 

February 17, 2011
Harold Snepsts to Join Canucks’ Ring of Honour

It was revealed today that our man Harold Snepsts will be the fourth inductee to the Canucks’ Ring of Honour later this season, making him the final honouree of this 40th anniversary season. 

Big Harold joins Orland Kurtenbach (the inaugural captain), Kirk McLean (the franchise’s best clutch goaltender) and Thomas Gradin (the pioneering skillful Swede) as Ring of Honour members. 

Snepsts was a colourful and popular player back in the day.  And in the end, after 40 years of franchise history, he still holds the record for most games played by a defensemen.  Most importantly, he was an intimidating presence on a team that sorely needed it.  And remarkably, he played in two NHL all-star games.

If the decisions were up to us, we would have made the exact same appointments as the Canucks have to date with respect to Ring of Honour recognition so we are giving Mike Gillis and company the big thumbs up.  So far. 

Of course, having finalized the inaugural four inductees for the Ring of Honour, the question of what to do with Pavel Bure must be brought up again.  At some point, he must be honoured in some fashion (either full fledged jersey retirement or Ring of Honour).  And as our readers know, we think it should be jersey retirement joining Stan Smyl, Trevor Linden and Markus Naslund with this highest franchise honour.

November 28, 2010
Ring of Honour

As part of the Canucks’ 40th anniversary celebrations, there will be four inductees into what is being referred to as the “Ring of Honour”, which is meant to honour those who fall short of jersey retirement (limited so far to Stan Smyl, Trevor Linden and, shortly, Markus Naslund).

So far two players have already been inducted: original Captain Canuck, Orland Kurtenbach and Captain Kirk (the most successful Canuck goalie to date), Kirk McLean.  It’s difficult to find fault with either of these selections, who clearly fall short of jersey retirement status but were both integral players in Canuck history.

Kurtenbach had a reputation as one of the genuinely toughest guys of his generation and led an expansion crew, that at the very least, was tough to play against.  And while he played only a mostly injury plagued four seasons with Vancouver and despite not having an official capacity with the team since a brief coaching stint in the late 70’s, he has often been an ambassador for the team.

McLean, of course, was one of the key players (arguably the most valuable player) of the famed ‘94 near Cup squad.  But while this moment in time certainly stands as his high water mark, he was a consistently strong netminder, and really, the first Canuck goalie to achieve a long run of high calibre backstopping.

So that brings us to the question on the minds of the long term faithful, who else should be rightly honoured?  As stated, there will be two more inductees this season and those within the organization who know have been sworn to secrecy.

The elephant in the room, of course, is Pavel Bure.  How his number is not being retired before the likes of Markus Naslund, is simply stated, a typically Canuck conundrum - an issue we covered in great detail here this summer.  He will almost certainly be inducted in the Hockey Hall of Fame in due course and be the only true Canuck representative in hockey’s hallowed shrine. 

On this basis alone, you’d think one day his number will hang from the rafters at Rogers Arena, after he’s paid whatever penance the club sees fit for holding his breath until he was shipped out of town.  So it follows that he’s above and beyond the “Ring of Honour”.  Or at least, he should be.

But putting aside the Russian Rocket for now, who else is worthy in the “Ring of Honour”? 

Well, if it were up to us (as it should be), we would allocate this year’s two other inductee spots to Harold Snepsts and Thomas Gradin.

Our man Harold logged the most games of any Canuck defender ever and was as tough as they came.  And damn it, we’re prepared to forget about the pass to Mike Bossy with two seconds remaining in overtime in Game 1 of the ‘82 Stanley Cup Final.  Indeed, despite that blunder, Harrrrrr-ollllllllld was arguably the biggest fan favourite in this town and always a menacing presence on the back end, something that today’s squad is often lacking.  And it certainly helps that he has recently returned to the Canuck operation as part of the scouting crew.

When Thomas Gradin arrived in Vancouver as the best of the Swedish contingent that Jake Milford was pioneering in the NHL, his world class skill was immediately obvious; mostly because we’d never seen anything like it from a guy in a Canuck uniform.  In the end, when he left Vancouver, he was the franchise point leader and had made plumber Stan Smyl a point per game player.  Like Snepsts, he has been a member of the Canucks’ scouting crew for a few seasons and is solely responsible for the drafting of Alex Edler (who happens to sport Gradin’s number 23). 

So what’s your take?  In the end, it’s your “Ring of Honour”.

August 26, 2010
THN’s Top 10 Canucks

Today, “The Hockey News” (“THN”) released their ranking of the all-time top 10 Canuck players (thanks to valued reader Steve M. for the heads-up).  These listings are never without controversy and while it’s easy to quibble about placing, what’s most important is did they get the right 10?  Of course, “The Hockey News” are hockey experts, but they’re not really Vancouver Canuck experts.  Thankfully, we are.  Below we’ve listed their rankings with our predictably candid commentary.

10. Harold Snepsts- If you’ve been around here any length of time, you’ll know of our undying man crush love for Harold.  As such, you’ll get no arguments here.  For all you youngsters out there, Snepsts logged more games on defense than any other Canuck defender and was legendarily tough.  If he had played this past season, there would have been no pissing and moaning about what Dustin Byfuglien was up to.  And remarkably (though a truer measure of the Canucks’ ineptitude than anything else), he played in two NHL All-Star games.

9. Tony Tanti- We got to see this guy play every home game as an impressionable youth back in the day and while he was durable and a most dependable scorer, he played in the highest scoring era ever and got to play along side silky smooth Patrik Sundstrom.  On that basis, he wouldn’t make our top 10.  His ‘82 Camaro does though.

8. Kirk McLean- At this point, he’s the all-time franchise leader for many goaltending categories and until Roberto Luongo can come up with a lengthy (Stanley Cup Final) run of his own has every reason to be on this list.  Poor Kirk was never the same after Jeff Brown slept with his wife.  Or was it after McLean stole Bruce Allen’s wife?  Yes, before Tiger Woods, there was Kirk McLean.  And Jeff Brown.

7. Mattias Ohlund- As the all-time highest scoring defender, it’s hard to argue against his inclusion on this list.  Even more so when you combine that with his feared hitting ability.  We will quibble about him being more highly ranked than Snepsts though.

6. Stan Smyl- It’s no surprise that “Steamer” is on this list as the first Canuck to have his jersey hung from the rafters.  Some would argue that he should be ranked higher based on his heart and soul contributions, but his offensive numbers are likely inflated due to the high scoring era in which he played. 

5. Markus Naslund- As the third nominee for roster retirement and all-time leading scorer, this one is a no-brainer.  Given his lack of playoff success, we are okay with him being ranked in the middle of the top 10.

4. Daniel Sedin - It’s hard to believe that Henrik and Daniel now rank 6th and 7th respectively in all-time games played and 4th and 6th respectively in points.  On this basis, it’s hard to argue their inclusion in the top 10, but without any significant playoff success, this ranking seems a little high.

3. Trevor Linden - Johnny Canuck.  A class act.  And often overlooked as one of the best clutch players of his generation.

2. Henrik Sedin - See Daniel.

1. Pavel Bure- Duh.  You know our thoughts on the Rocket, probably ad nauseam.   This selection again reinforces the idiocy of his exclusion from the retired jersey club.  Seriously, if an objective hockey expert from “The Hockey News” sees fit to name him as the greatest Canuck ever, why can’t the damn franchise do the same?

So it seems we are generally happy with THN’s top 10 (seeding aside) save the Tony Tanti selection.  It’s hard to imagine a top 10 list that doesn’t include Thomas Gradin, who after Pavel Bure and perhaps the Sedins was the most skilled player ever to play for this sorry squad.  If not Gradin, then original Canuck Andre Boudrias deserves more consideration than Tanti.  During the Canucks’ first run at respectability in the mid 70’s he was their leading scorer.  Another possible replacement for Tanti could be defensemen Doug Lidster, who was shipped out of town just before the ‘94 Cup run (luckily for him to the Cup winning Rangers), but was the best defensemen on the team for the decade leading up to that point.

Some are whining about no Todd Bertuzzi.  Really?  This is top 10 Canucks, not top 10 Malcontents.  Bertuzzi could have been top of this list if he’d embraced the opportunity to be the best power forward of his generation instead of sulking and complaining all the while getting paid a kings’ ransom to play a kids’ game.  And some old schoolers will complain that the exclusion of Richard Brodeur is unforgivable.  But objectively speaking, aside from the famed ‘82 Cup run and his lovable persona, his numbers weren’t that good.  He does host a fine golf tournament though.

We look forward to your takes on this.  Who do you think should be in and out?

June 30, 2010
So You Think You’re Tough - Round Two CLOSED

As you would expect, things got a little heated in Round 2 of our little game determining the “toughest” Canuck ever.  We will commence with Round 3 on Monday.  And promise to pick-up the pace.  This will end long before training camp.

Here’s a quick recap of Round 2 results:

1. In our most controversial match-up, Trevor Linden barely out pointed Ron Delorme.  You, valued reader, turned out in droves to vote on this one, which featured many lead changes and was basically a split vote from start to finish, with Trevor edging out Chief by the narrowest of margins.  So clearly the broad definition of toughness wins out.  For now.

2. In another ridiculously close encounter, Stan Smyl bested linemate Curt Fraser by a single vote.  Clearly, Smyl’s enduring legendary status in this town provided him with the momentum to get past the more dangerous Fraser.

3. In a battle of top defensemen, Harold Snepsts, easily out voted Ed Jovanovski.  We applaude your discerning taste.

4. And in a match that should have never happened, Gino Odjick pretended Mattias Ohlund was the St. Louis Blues, with a most logical conclusion. 

Thanks for playing.  Round 2 featured a record number of votes; we can only hope you’ll hang around for Round 3 (starting Monday).

June 17, 2010
So You Think You’re Tough - Round Two, Match Three

Today’s competition features two legendary defensemen, both big fan favourites…

Harold Snepsts - Here at CC, we have a serious case of man crush love for “Harooooooold”.  And not because of his dashing good looks.  Snepsts was a war horse defensemen, punishing hitter and a feared fighter.  Forget about the giveaway to Mike Bossy in OT of game 1 of the ‘82 final, we’re talking about physical toughness here and he was as tough as they came.  There’s no shortage of vintage Snepsts clips, but we like this one, which is from late in his career (while playing for the Wings) taking on the supposed tough guy, Wendel Clark (in his presumed prime).  Even an old Harold can open a can of whup ass on the hated Leaf.  Harold, in the most lopsided round 1 match-up, made Tim Hunter, remarkably, just a little uglier.

Ed Jovanovski - “Special Ed” was almost the complete package with great speed, good puck skills, an often fiery disposition and quick heavy hands when it came to scrapping.  “Jovo Cop” used his fleet feet to become a feared open ice hitter.  Always a great teammate, he was eager to take one for the team.  Here he is making quick work of Adam Deadmarsh, handing the poor guy the first of many concussions.  Eddie proved his popularity around here defeating the legendarily dirty Dave “Tiger” Williams in the last round.

View and vote here:

Today’s Honourable Mention:

Barry Wilkins - Who the heck is this guy?  Better known as the guy that scored the Canucks first NHL goal, Wilkins was a hard rock defenseman “back in the day”.  This hard nosed defender was the Nucks’ most consistent d-man in their early years, providing crucial toughness to an expansion team that certainly needed it. 

Tomorrow, we will bring you the final Round Two pairing.

June 14, 2010
So You Think You’re Tough - Round One CLOSED

Okay, we’ve milked this for long enough - we’re on to round two.  Thanks for your participation.  A quick recap of round one:

  1. Trevor Linden defeated Rick Rypien in a mismatch.  Clearly, the voters are putting more emphasis on a balanced definition of toughness as opposed to pure pugilism.  We applaud your discriminating taste. 
  2. Stan Smyl took out the much larger Jack McIlhargey in a fairly lopsided pairing.  After this battle, we envision Jack Mac wearing that neck brace he fashioned on one of the late 70’s hockey cards of our youth.
  3. Harold Snepsts destroyed Tim Hunter in our most lopsided match.  And no, we were not stuffing the ballot box in favour of our hero Harold.  Really, an ex-Flame had no business being in this contest in the first place. 
  4. Mattias Ohlund narrowly edged out Cam Neely.  This will have some eyes rolling but Mattias presumably gets credibility for his long career here.  In fact, we will go as far to say that if Ohlund were not Swedish, he’d have been a bigger fan favourite here and just might have wound up with his number hanging from the rafters.  Flame away.
  5. Ron “Chief” Delorme took out “The Strangler”, Garth Butcher, in a close match (did we say how much we loved the old school nicknames?).  We suspect ”Chief” (now the Canucks’ Chief Amateur Scout) won’t get much further.  Especially, if we get too much further in our draft analysis before his next match.
  6. Gino Odjick barely eclipsed the original “Captain Canuck”, Orland Kurtenbach, in another close one.  We’re sure this will leave some of the 70’s natives (we mean you, kenikoop) more than a little restless.  If anything, this proves that pure pugilism can win out, particularly against a faceless victim (sorry Kurt, but you’re too old for our sketchy memories).
  7. Ed “Jovo Cop” Jovanovski dispensed with Dave “Tiger” Williams proving that you don’t need brain to overcome brawn.  Perhaps just more brawn.  Or less criminal convictions. 
  8. Curt Fraser in the tightest match-up brought down Donald Brashear.  We’re surprised by this outcome, not because Fraser wasn’t fantastically tough, but because his prime was quite sometime ago and Brash was the heavyweight champ for so many years. 

We’ll start with round 2 tomorrow.  Enjoy.

June 3, 2010

Anonymous asked: do you own any canucks jerseys?

We’re not much for fashion at CC, but we do confess to a small collection of Canuck attire.  Our favourite is a vintage autographed Harold Snepsts jersey.  There’s a Kyle Wellwood jersey that was benched for most of the season, until he found his game late.  There’s the Martin Gelinas jersey (the Orca Bay era logo) that used to get lots of play back in the day.  The autographed Trevor Linden jersey is a recent edition (thanks, Pete) and will be saved for something real special.  And an original stick-in-the-rink logo home white with number 26 - we have no idea why.  And there’s one more, but it’s not really a Canuck jersey - it’s a game worn Philly Flyer jersey worn by none other than Donald Brashear - that gets lots of action these days.  This jersey is dear to our hearts since we outbid cocky Matt Cooke at a silent auction to get it.  That’s if you call paying $150 for an autographed game worn jersey “outbidding”.  Poor Donald gets no respect.  And to no one’s surprise, Matt Cooke is a cheap f*cker.

May 30, 2010
So You Think You’re Tough - Round One, Match Three

For those arriving late and wondering what is going on, go here: http://criticallycanuck.tumblr.com/post/618344692/so-you-think-youre-tough

For those who haven’t voted for Round One, Match One, go here: http://criticallycanuck.tumblr.com/post/638349098/so-you-think-youre-tough-round-one-match-one

For those who haven’t voted for Round One, Match Two, go here: http://criticallycanuck.tumblr.com/post/640017786/so-you-think-youre-tough-round-one-match-two

And now, today’s business:

Harold Snepsts - Here at CC, we have a serious case of man crush love for “Harooooooold”.  And not because of his dashing good looks.  Snepsts was a war horse defensemen, punishing hitter and a feared fighter.  Forget about the giveaway to Mike Bossy in OT of game 1 of the ‘82 final, we’re talking about physical toughness here and he was as tough as they came.

There’s no shortage of vintage Snepsts clips, but we like this one, which is from late in his career (while playing for the Wings) taking on the supposed tough guy, Wendel Clark (in his presumed prime).  Even an old Harold can open a can of whup ass on the hated Leaf:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJshJaGYk54

And if that wasn’t enough, you can find clips of him in his early days destroying Dave “The Hammer” Schultz, renowned by many as the toughest of the tough Broad Street Bullies (the quality is crap, but the beating is not):

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwhGMg92_Ok

Tim Hunter - So we have to ask the question, was he tough because of that face.  Or did he have that face because he wasn’t so good at being tough?  We say it was the former that left Hunter with little option but to be one of the most feared and respected heavyweights of his generation.  By the time his career brought him to Vancouver, his “best” days were behind him, but his toughness seemed to rub off on the rest of his teammates.  He was a key component of the famed ‘94 team.  Here he is taking on most of the Winnipeg Jets (including bowling ball headed Tie Domi):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MURr4cN3N8

Today’s Honourable Mention:

Sergio Momesso - This lead footed winger could never work his way off the top 3 lines no matter how indifferent his play nor how many boneheaded penalties he took.  That said, the “Italian Stallion” was a big body with a nasty temperament.  As Tom Larschied was apt to point out, “Sergio looks like a guy that just had his car stolen”.